Przejdź do treści
Explore Resources
  • University of the Future
  • Documents
  • Videos, Lectures and Discussions
  • Expert Profiles
  • Perspectives
  • The Virtual Doughnut

Policy & Strategy

8
  • Values as the glue of the university community
  • Work readiness vs. the broader educational mission
  • Quality and affordability — a multi-layered strategy, not a trade-off
  • Quality and affordability of education
  • Balancing work readiness with the academic mission
  • A seesaw between current job-market needs and future thinking
  • Free speech at university — the best interruption is an argument
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Technology & Transformation

10
  • Skills for the AI revolution — critical thinking and pre-AI skills
  • Using AI tools ethically and effectively in academia
  • A hybrid skill set for an AI-rich world
  • AI, responsible use, and work readiness
  • Wizard for a day — what he would change
  • Teaching students to use AI as an assistant, not for plagiarism
  • Reasoning, ethics and empathy at the centre of the curriculum
  • Integrating AI thoughtfully and doubling down on human skills
  • Critical thinking where AI is weak
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future University Models

9
  • The changing role of universities — opening the ivory tower
  • The university as an adaptive institution
  • Are we nearing the end of study programmes?
  • Lifelong learning as a core university mission
  • Reinventing degrees — modular, European and competency-based
  • Evolution, not revolution — toward modular, micro-credential curricula
  • Some programs stay, some adapt, some go niche
  • Internationalization, joint programs and skill-based learning
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future University & Society

10
  • How universities should respond to pseudoscience
  • Pseudoscience as a product of disappointment with science
  • University as a school of life, not just academics
  • Universities should host non-academic discussion and integration
  • Universities should be political — but not party-political
  • Teachers, not preachers — universities’ impact on society
  • Building the red light — verification over blind acceptance
  • Dialogue — faster and more direct, without losing rigor
  • Beat pseudoscience through academic debate, not silence
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future of Research

5
  • When a measure becomes a goal — measuring excellence without gaming it
  • How to measure academic excellence
  • Reading rankings in context — a European path
  • Admit your views, then draw the line
  • Show all perspectives; grade argumentation, not opinions

Future of Teaching & Learning

15
  • Creativity and imagination in future curricula
  • Critical thinking vs. specialization — two sides of the same coin
  • A day in class in 20 years — studios, AI tutors and the teacher as mentor
  • The dream exam — an opinion-based essay
  • Creativity and imagination in future curricula
  • Students helping to create their own learning paths
  • University as preparation for work and real life
  • Balancing mandatory courses with student-chosen electives
  • The classroom of the future — active, flexible, AI-assisted
  • A performance-based exam built on creativity
  • Creativity and imagination as foundational, teachable pillars
  • Students as partners in shaping the curriculum
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected
  • Give students real choice — and co-responsibility
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected
View Categories
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Future University & Society
  • How universities should respond to pseudoscience
Future UNILAB · University of the Future

Krzysztof Cipora

How universities should respond to pseudoscience

The question
How should our universities respond to the rising threat of pseudoscience?

Watch

Summary

Pseudoscience spreads fast through social media, online fora and groups, reaching people who would not otherwise engage in scientific discussion, and it poses real risks — from public health (as seen during COVID) to holding back the progress of society. Universities must not pretend the problem does not exist. They should introduce general courses in creative thinking as well as debating skills and rhetoric, so that every graduate, regardless of programme, feels confident and equipped to challenge pseudo-scientific beliefs — from flat-earth claims to public-health myths — both by possessing the knowledge and by being able to argue for science accurately.

Universities first of all shouldn’t be pretending that it doesn’t exist.

What are your Feelings

  • Happy
  • Normal
  • Sad

© 2024 University of the Future. All rights reserved.

Subscribe to our newsletter