Which Core Values Should Inform the University of the Future to Avoid the Binaries of the Traditional Ivory Tower and Rigid Managerialism?
What values should define the university of the future, and how can academic institutions balance independence, institutional structures, and societal responsibility? This Future UniLab envisioning report explores how universities can move beyond the traditional opposition between the isolated „ivory tower” and rigid managerialism. It proposes a vision of universities as trustworthy, autonomous, and socially engaged institutions guided by integrity, freedom, openness, and a commitment to the public good.
The publication develops three complementary metaphors to illustrate the foundations of the university of the future. The university as a „Lighthouse” represents a reliable and accessible partner to society, combining academic excellence, long-term vision, and effective knowledge communication. The „Box” metaphor highlights the importance of institutional structures that provide stability and security while remaining sufficiently flexible to encourage innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and institutional transformation. The university as a „Compass” symbolises the role of shared values, including freedom, equality, and autonomy, in navigating uncertainty and guiding individuals and communities towards a better future.
Particular attention is given to the importance of clear, honest, and accessible communication between universities and society. The authors argue that knowledge must extend beyond academic institutions without losing its scientific rigour or being reduced to purely economic value. Universities should strengthen their role as independent sources of expertise, public dialogue, and critical reflection, while fostering cooperation rather than competition within academic communities.
The report concludes with practical proposals for institutional transformation, including the creation of an „Anti-Kafka Taskforce” to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, the development of networks of „critical friends” to provide constructive external feedback, and stronger university participation in public debate and evidence-based policymaking. Ultimately, the authors advocate a university that combines intellectual independence with social responsibility, institutional flexibility, and the courage to pursue ambitious ideals for the future.