Przejdź do treści
Explore Resources
  • University of the Future
  • Documents
  • Videos, Lectures and Discussions
  • Perspectives
  • The Virtual Doughnut
  • Games about the University of the Future

Policy & Strategy

8
  • Values as the glue of the university community
  • Work readiness vs. the broader educational mission
  • Quality and affordability — a multi-layered strategy, not a trade-off
  • Quality and affordability of education
  • Balancing work readiness with the academic mission
  • Free speech at university — the best interruption is an argument
  • A seesaw between current job-market needs and future thinking
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Technology & Transformation

12
  • Skills for the AI revolution — critical thinking and pre-AI skills
  • Using AI tools ethically and effectively in academia
  • A hybrid skill set for an AI-rich world
  • AI, responsible use, and work readiness
  • Wizard for a day — what he would change
  • Teaching students to use AI as an assistant, not for plagiarism
  • Reasoning, ethics and empathy at the centre of the curriculum
  • Integrating AI thoughtfully and doubling down on human skills
  • Critical thinking where AI is weak
  • Digital Infrastructure for the University of the Future
  • Being Human in a Digital World
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future University Models

22
  • The changing role of universities — opening the ivory tower
  • The university as an adaptive institution
  • Are we nearing the end of study programmes?
  • Lifelong learning as a core university mission
  • Reinventing degrees — modular, European and competency-based
  • Evolution, not revolution — toward modular, micro-credential curricula
  • Some programs stay, some adapt, some go niche
  • Internationalization, joint programs and skill-based learning
  • The Cocktail University: Rethinking Integration and Co-creation in Higher Education
  • Sustainability and Resilience in the University of the Future
  • Digital Infrastructure for the University of the Future
  • Rethinking the Social and Cultural Role of Universities
  • Proposing Values for the European University of the Future
  • Facilitating Mutual Understanding and Cooperation Between Una Europa Universities
  • Sustainability: Universities Leading the Transition Towards a Sustainable Future
  • How to Develop a Model of University’s Comprehensive and Balanced Communication?
  • Which Core Values Should Inform the University of the Future to Avoid the Binaries of the Traditional Ivory Tower and Rigid Managerialism?
  •  Is It Reasonable to Further Integrate Various Dimensions of the University’s Mission, and How to Do It?
  • Instruments Cluster: Management Models of the University of the Future
  • The Relevance of Universities
  • The European University of the Future: Bold, Integrated, Open
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future University & Society

44
  • How universities should respond to pseudoscience
  • Pseudoscience as a product of disappointment with science
  • University as a school of life, not just academics
  • Universities should host non-academic discussion and integration
  • Universities should be political — but not party-political
  • Teachers, not preachers — universities’ impact on society
  • Building the red light — verification over blind acceptance
  • Dialogue — faster and more direct, without losing rigor
  • Beat pseudoscience through academic debate, not silence
  • Measure excellence from the beginning, not only at the end
  • Classical universities must find a new place in contemporary society
  • Start over: design the university for today, not for the past
  • The best learning happens between classes
  • The university is for society, not for itself
  • Shared values as the foundation of the university of the future
  • AI literacy is a cross-disciplinary, never-ending journey
  • The classroom as a place of exploration, not of five learning outcomes
  • Universities are part of society — and of a global world
  • Humor as the driving force of university communities
  • The classroom in 20 years will look much like today
  • Digitalisation reveals stories we have never seen
  • Digital data to prevent decay in historic buildings
  • Digitalisation keeps new generations connected to heritage
  • Immersive technology will change heritage digitisation — if it stays accessible
  • Mastery over machines and skills that are uniquely human
  • The age of splitters is over — now come the lumpers
  • Digitalising university heritage is a strategic step
  • Filling the gaps of the past with digital tools
  • Digital heritage skills belong at every level of study
  • Selection and accessibility: the paradox of digital heritage
  • In an age of infinite truths, the university as a safe haven
  • Reinvent academic performance before measuring excellence
  • Universities should apply their own research to themselves
  • Teach orientation, not recipes
  • The Cocktail University: Rethinking Integration and Co-creation in Higher Education
  • Sustainability and Resilience in the University of the Future
  • How Can Universities Promote the Well-being of Employees and Students and Help Them Flourish?
  • Instruments Cluster: Management Models of the University of the Future
  • Being Human in a Digital World
  • Learning, Values and Impact
  • The Relevance of Universities
  • Sustainability vs Mobility
  • The European University of the Future: Bold, Integrated, Open
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future of Research

5
  • When a measure becomes a goal — measuring excellence without gaming it
  • How to measure academic excellence
  • Reading rankings in context — a European path
  • Admit your views, then draw the line
  • Show all perspectives; grade argumentation, not opinions

Future of Teaching & Learning

18
  • Creativity and imagination in future curricula
  • Critical thinking vs. specialization — two sides of the same coin
  • A day in class in 20 years — studios, AI tutors and the teacher as mentor
  • The dream exam — an opinion-based essay
  • Creativity and imagination in future curricula
  • Students helping to create their own learning paths
  • University as preparation for work and real life
  • Balancing mandatory courses with student-chosen electives
  • The classroom of the future — active, flexible, AI-assisted
  • A performance-based exam built on creativity
  • Creativity and imagination as foundational, teachable pillars
  • Students as partners in shaping the curriculum
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected
  • Give students real choice — and co-responsibility
  • Digital Infrastructure for the University of the Future
  • How Can Universities Promote the Well-being of Employees and Students and Help Them Flourish?
  • Sustainability vs Mobility
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected
View Categories
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Future University Models
  • Which Core Values Should Inform the University of the Future to Avoid the Binaries of the Traditional Ivory Tower and Rigid Managerialism?

1 min read

0:00 / 2:20
Future UNILAB · University of the Future
Envisioning Report

Which Core Values Should Inform the University of the Future to Avoid the Binaries of the Traditional Ivory Tower and Rigid Managerialism?

Organisation: Una Europa Published: 18 May 2022 Format: PDF
The Question
What core values should guide the university of the future, enabling it to move beyond the traditional ivory tower and rigid managerialism while preserving academic freedom, institutional integrity, and meaningful engagement with society?
Abstract

What values should define the university of the future, and how can academic institutions balance independence, institutional structures, and societal responsibility? This Future UniLab envisioning report explores how universities can move beyond the traditional opposition between the isolated „ivory tower” and rigid managerialism. It proposes a vision of universities as trustworthy, autonomous, and socially engaged institutions guided by integrity, freedom, openness, and a commitment to the public good.

The publication develops three complementary metaphors to illustrate the foundations of the university of the future. The university as a „Lighthouse” represents a reliable and accessible partner to society, combining academic excellence, long-term vision, and effective knowledge communication. The „Box” metaphor highlights the importance of institutional structures that provide stability and security while remaining sufficiently flexible to encourage innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and institutional transformation. The university as a „Compass” symbolises the role of shared values, including freedom, equality, and autonomy, in navigating uncertainty and guiding individuals and communities towards a better future.

Particular attention is given to the importance of clear, honest, and accessible communication between universities and society. The authors argue that knowledge must extend beyond academic institutions without losing its scientific rigour or being reduced to purely economic value. Universities should strengthen their role as independent sources of expertise, public dialogue, and critical reflection, while fostering cooperation rather than competition within academic communities.

The report concludes with practical proposals for institutional transformation, including the creation of an „Anti-Kafka Taskforce” to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, the development of networks of „critical friends” to provide constructive external feedback, and stronger university participation in public debate and evidence-based policymaking. Ultimately, the authors advocate a university that combines intellectual independence with social responsibility, institutional flexibility, and the courage to pursue ambitious ideals for the future.

Keywords
University Values Academic Freedom Institutional Autonomy University Governance Societal Engagement Science Communication Institutional Innovation University Transformation Public Responsibility Future of Higher Education
Authors

Leo Van Broeck, Tuomas Heikkilä, Ignacio Pajon Leyra, Katharina Schmitt.

Facilitator: Aleksandra Lis.

Document
PDF
Which Core Values Should Inform the University of the Future?
Future UniLab · Values Cluster · 2022
Read Document ↗
Report
Report

What are your Feelings

  • Happy
  • Normal
  • Sad

Project co-funded by the European Union under the European Funds for Social Development (FERS) programme.
Project value: PLN 1,924,744.00 Implementation period: 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2026 #EUFunds #EuropeanFunds

© 2026 University of the Future. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Subscribe to our newsletter

Dostosowania Dostępności

Napędzane przez OneTap

Jak długo chcesz ukryć pasek narzędzi?
Czas Trwania Ukrycia Paska Narzędzi
Wybierz swój profil dostępności
Tryb Osób z Upośledzeniem Wzroku
Wzbogaca wizualne elementy strony internetowej
Profil Bezpieczny dla Napadów
Usuwa błyski i zmniejsza kolory
Tryb Przyjazny dla ADHD
Skupione przeglądanie, bez rozproszenia
Tryb Ślepoty
Zmniejsza rozproszenie, poprawia skupienie
Tryb Bezpieczny dla Epilepsji
Przyciemnia kolory i zatrzymuje miganie
Moduły Treści
Rozmiar Czcionki

Domyślne

Wysokość Linii

Domyślne

Moduły Kolorów
Moduły Orientacji