Przejdź do treści
Explore Resources
  • University of the Future
  • Documents
  • Videos, Lectures and Discussions
  • Expert Profiles
  • Perspectives
  • The Virtual Doughnut

Policy & Strategy

8
  • Values as the glue of the university community
  • Work readiness vs. the broader educational mission
  • Quality and affordability — a multi-layered strategy, not a trade-off
  • Quality and affordability of education
  • Balancing work readiness with the academic mission
  • A seesaw between current job-market needs and future thinking
  • Free speech at university — the best interruption is an argument
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Technology & Transformation

10
  • Skills for the AI revolution — critical thinking and pre-AI skills
  • Using AI tools ethically and effectively in academia
  • A hybrid skill set for an AI-rich world
  • AI, responsible use, and work readiness
  • Wizard for a day — what he would change
  • Teaching students to use AI as an assistant, not for plagiarism
  • Reasoning, ethics and empathy at the centre of the curriculum
  • Integrating AI thoughtfully and doubling down on human skills
  • Critical thinking where AI is weak
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future University Models

9
  • The changing role of universities — opening the ivory tower
  • The university as an adaptive institution
  • Are we nearing the end of study programmes?
  • Lifelong learning as a core university mission
  • Reinventing degrees — modular, European and competency-based
  • Evolution, not revolution — toward modular, micro-credential curricula
  • Some programs stay, some adapt, some go niche
  • Internationalization, joint programs and skill-based learning
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future University & Society

10
  • How universities should respond to pseudoscience
  • Pseudoscience as a product of disappointment with science
  • University as a school of life, not just academics
  • Universities should host non-academic discussion and integration
  • Universities should be political — but not party-political
  • Teachers, not preachers — universities’ impact on society
  • Building the red light — verification over blind acceptance
  • Dialogue — faster and more direct, without losing rigor
  • Beat pseudoscience through academic debate, not silence
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected

Future of Research

5
  • When a measure becomes a goal — measuring excellence without gaming it
  • How to measure academic excellence
  • Reading rankings in context — a European path
  • Admit your views, then draw the line
  • Show all perspectives; grade argumentation, not opinions

Future of Teaching & Learning

15
  • Creativity and imagination in future curricula
  • Critical thinking vs. specialization — two sides of the same coin
  • A day in class in 20 years — studios, AI tutors and the teacher as mentor
  • The dream exam — an opinion-based essay
  • Creativity and imagination in future curricula
  • Students helping to create their own learning paths
  • University as preparation for work and real life
  • Balancing mandatory courses with student-chosen electives
  • The classroom of the future — active, flexible, AI-assisted
  • A performance-based exam built on creativity
  • Creativity and imagination as foundational, teachable pillars
  • Students as partners in shaping the curriculum
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected
  • Give students real choice — and co-responsibility
  • Creativity as method, not a goal artificially injected
View Categories
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Future of Teaching & Learning
  • Give students real choice — and co-responsibility
Future UNILAB · University of the Future

Paweł Laidler

Give students real choice — and co-responsibility

The question
To what extent should students co-create their learning paths?

Watch

Summary

Students are key members of the community, not just addressees of courses, and their perspective on the kind of learning they want should be gathered — some come for a degree, some are passionate about research, some simply want attractive courses. Involving them in designing a course or a whole learning path helps them reach the goal they arrived with. Despite the risk that less ambitious students seek the easiest route, beyond the core courses of a discipline students should be able to choose at least 30-50% of their courses, following a coherent path while taking co-responsibility for their career — supported by advising units. Laidler favours liberal, open programs that don’t confine all ECTS credits to one field, offering interdisciplinary, skills-focused courses so that mature students shape their own path and earn a degree that truly reflects their competences.

If we give them freedom, we will allow them to take responsibility or be co-responsible for their future career path.

What are your Feelings

  • Happy
  • Normal
  • Sad

© 2024 University of the Future. All rights reserved.

Subscribe to our newsletter